On September 27, 2010, the President signed the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, passed by Congress the prior week.  The Act’s title “Small Business Jobs Act of 2010” does not reflect its true scope; its provisions impact businesses of many sizes.

In addition to the many non-tax provisions related to small business lending and access to capital, tax provisions in the legislation include a retroactive extension of bonus depreciation, a doubling of the Code Sec. 179 expense limit, a five-year general business credit carry-back, a 100 percent exclusion for qualified investments in small business, an increase in start-up business expensing, and a five-year holding period for built-in gains of S Corporations. Other provisions address the tax treatment of business-provided cell phones, the penalty for failure to report a listed transaction, Roth accounts in 401(k), 403(b) and 457(b) plans, and the treatment of nonqualified annuities.  Revenue offsets included in the legislation remove crude tall oil from eligibility for the cellulosic bio-fuels credit, increase the penalties for failure to file information returns, expanded 1099 reporting of real estate rental payments, allow earlier IRS levies on federal contractor payments, and address the sourcing rules for guarantee fees.

Bonus Depreciation

The new law extends, through December 31, 2010, 50-percent first-year bonus depreciation, which had expired at the end of 2009. The extension is retroactive to January 1, 2010. The new law also extends, through 2011, the additional year of bonus depreciation allowed for property with a recovery period of 10 years or longer, and for transportation property (tangible personal property used to transport people or property).

IMPACT. Bonus depreciation is not limited by the size of the business, unlike practical access to Code Sec. 179 “small business” expensing. The bonus depreciation provision is by far the most expensive single tax break in the bill, weighing in at $5.4 billion over 10 years, but carrying an initial cost of $29.5 billion in its first two years because of accelerated depreciation that would otherwise be deducted in later years. Bonus depreciation under the new law carries a very short window of opportunity — qualifying equipment must be purchased and placed into service on or before December 31, 2010.

Long-term contracts. The new law also decouples bonus depreciation from allocation of contract costs under the percentage of completion accounting method rules for assets with a depreciable life of seven years or less.

IMPACT. This change permits contractors to benefit from bonus depreciation even if they do not complete their contracts within the same year.

Code Sec. 280F. The limitation under Code Sec. 280F on the amount of depreciation deductions allowed with respect to certain passenger automobiles is increased in the first year by $8,000 for automobiles that qualify and for which the taxpayer does not elect out of the additional first-year deduction. For 2010, therefore, maximum first year depreciation for passenger automobiles is $11,060 ($11,160 for light trucks).

Code Sec. 179 Expensing

Eligible taxpayers may elect to claim a Code Sec. 179 expense deduction on the purchase price of qualified Code Sec. 179 property. Under current law, the maximum deduction for tax years beginning in 2010 is $250,000. The dollar limit is reduced by the amount by which the cost of qualifying property placed in service during the tax year exceeds $800,000. For 2011, the expensing limit had been scheduled to revert to prior levels of $25,000 and $200,000, respectively, both not indexed for inflation. The new law increases the maximum deduction to $500,000 and the investment limit to $2 million for tax years beginning in 2010 and 2011.

IMPACT. The new law increases in the qualifying property cap from $800,000 to $2 million effectively increases the availability of Code Sec. 179 expensing to many more businesses. Under the new law, the Code Sec. 179 expensing deduction does not phase out completely until the cost of eligible property exceeds $2.5 million. Perhaps even more important, however, the nontax provisions in H.R. 5297 will serve to open up the credit markets needed by small businesses to find the capital to buy equipment that qualifies for either enhanced Code Sec. 179 expensing or bonus depreciation under the bill.

Qualified real property. The new law also temporarily expands the definition of qualified Code Sec. 179 property to include qualified real property, which is defined as qualified leasehold improvement property, qualified restaurant property and qualified retail improvement property. However, taxpayers are limited to expensing up to $250,000 of the total cost of these properties. The new law provides that the dollar cap will apply to the aggregate cost of qualified real property. Further, the bill provides for limitations on the carryover of qualified real property deductions.

COMMENT. A taxpayer may elect to exclude real property from the definition of Code Sec. 179 property. That election might prove useful to certain taxpayers if the regular $2 million eligible property cap is otherwise close to being reached.

COMMENT. The new law continues to treat computer software as qualified Code Sec. 179 property that is subject to full Code Sec. 179 expensing otherwise reserved for tangible personal property.

COMMENT. President Obama had proposed to end what has become the frequent extensions of increased Code Sec. 179 expensing by permanently raising the expensing amount to $125,000 and the phase-out threshold to $500,000 for tax years beginning after 2010 (both amounts indexed for inflation). Now that Code Sec. 179 expensing has been raised for 2011 as well as 2010, it is unlikely that Congress will act on a permanent extension of increased Code Sec. 179 expensing before next year.

S Corp Built-In Gain Period

A C corporation that converts to an S corporation generally must hold any appreciated assets for 10 years following the conversion or, if disposed of earlier, pay tax on the appreciation at the highest corporate level rate (currently 35 percent). The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) temporarily shortened the usual 10-year holding period to seven years for dispositions in tax years beginning in 2009 and 2010. The new law further shortens the holding period to five years in the case of dispositions in any tax year beginning in 2011, if the fifth year in the recognition period precedes the tax year beginning in 2011.

IMPACT. The built-in gains tax prevents C corporations from avoiding corporate level tax on the disposition of appreciated assets it acquired while a C corporation by first converting to S corporation status. The new law offers S corporations more flexibility in shedding historic C corporation assets that either no longer suit business needs or can provide additional capital through their sale to better assure the S corporation’s survival during the economic downturn.

COMMENT. The five-year period in the new law refers to five calendar years from the first day of the first tax year for which the corporation was an S corporation.

Cell Phones

The new law removes cell phones and similar personal communication devices from their current classification as listed property under Code Sec. 280F, thereby lifting the strict substantiation requirements of use and the additional limits placed on depreciation deductions. In addition, the provision enables the fair market value of personal use of a cell phone or other similar device provided to an employee predominantly for business purposes to be excluded from gross income.

IMPACT. This “listed property” designation was imposed on cell phones when they were novel, expensive, and not widely owned. Today, not only are cell phones widely available and used, but also necessary for doing business. IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman announced in January 2010 that the IRS would call a temporary halt to enforcing strict substantiation on cell phone use until Congress made good on its leadership’s promise to pass remedial legislation. The new law’s relief applies to tax years beginning after December 31, 2009.


The new law targets a variety of tax incentives exclusively to small businesses, including extended carryback for the general business credit, enhanced AMT offset, and relief from Code Sec. 6707A penalties.

Extended Carryback Of General Business Credit

The new law extends the carryback period for eligible small business credits to five years. Eligible small business credits are the sum of the general business credits determined for the tax year with respect to an eligible small business. The extended carryback provision is effective for credits determined in the taxpayer’s first tax year beginning after December 31, 2009.

IMPACT. An eligible small business for purposes of the enhanced general business credit is a corporation whose stock is not publicly traded, a partnership or a sole proprietorship. Additionally, the average annual gross receipts of the corporation, partnership, or sole proprietorship for the prior three tax year periods cannot exceed $50 million.

AMT offset. Under the new law, an eligible small business credit may offset both regular and AMT liability.

Qualified Small Business Stock

The 2009 Recovery Act temporarily increased the Code Sec. 1202 percentage exclusion for qualified small business stock sold by an individual from 50 percent to 75 percent for stock acquired after February 17, 2009 and before January 1, 2011, and held for more than five years. The new law raises the exclusion to 100 percent for gain on stock acquired after the date of enactment of the bill and before January 1, 2011. Under the new law, the excluded gain will not count as an AMT preference item but the five-year holding period continues to apply.

IMPACT. With both the income tax and capital gains rates anticipated to rise in the future, the benefits of an investment in Section 1202 stock become even more substantial as acquired shares are sold in 2015 or later under the five-year holding period rule. Since stock is the key to this benefit, the corporate form of doing business may have a leg up on unincorporated entities in this regard.

PLANNING NOTE. To be eligible for the exclusion both prior to and under the bill, the individual must generally acquire the small business stock at its original issue (directly or through an underwriter) for money, for property other than stock, or as compensation for services. When the stock is issued, the aggregate gross assets of the issuing corporation may not exceed $50 million. In addition, the corporation also must use at least 80 percent of the value of its assets in the active conduct of one or more qualified trades or businesses. The stock or eligible replacement must be held for at least five years.

COMMENT. Under Code Sec. 1202 limitations already in place, the amount of gain eligible for the 100 percent exclusion by an individual with respect to any corporation is capped at the greater of (1) 10 times the taxpayer’s basis in the stock or (2) $10 million.

Code Sec. 6707A Penalty Relief

Taxpayers failing to disclose participation in certain tax shelters are liable for penalties under Code Sec. 6707A. For certain violations, those penalties had netted minimum dollar amounts that, in practice, were draconian to certain small businesses as compared to any claimed tax benefits. The new law provides a general rule that a participant in a reportable transaction that fails to disclose the transaction is subject to a penalty equal to 75 percent of the decrease in tax shown on the return as a result of the transaction or which would have resulted if the transaction was respected for federal tax purposes. Regardless of the amount determined under the general rule, the new law specifies that the penalty may not exceed certain maximum amounts ($10,000 for an individual taxpayer failing to disclose a reportable transaction; $50,000 for all other taxpayers, $100,000 for an individual taxpayer failing to disclose a listed transaction; and $200,000 for all other taxpayers). The new law also provides a minimum penalty of $5,000 for an individual taxpayer failing to disclose a reportable transaction or a listed transaction. The minimum penalty for all other taxpayers would be $10,000. The relief in the new law applies to Code Sec. 6707A penalties assessed after December 31, 2006.

IMPACT. The change is intended to ameliorate the impact of the penalty on small businesses. At Congressional hearings, small business owners told lawmakers of penalty assessments that vastly exceeded the tax benefits of the transactions, many of which, the small business owners testified, they did not know were tax shelters.

IMPACT. The retroactive effective date opens up refund opportunities on penalties that the IRS has not otherwise held in abeyance pending this much-anticipated law change. The IRS temporarily stopped collecting Code Sec. 6707A penalties for undisclosed tax shelter transactions starting in June 2009 and extended its forbearance several times. Its latest collections moratorium had officially ended on June 1, 2010.

COMMENT. A reportable transaction is one that the IRS has determined requires disclosure because it has a potential for tax evasion. A listed transaction is a reportable transaction specifically identified by the IRS as an improper tax avoidance transaction.

Start-Up Expense Deduction

Taxpayers have generally been able to deduct up to $5,000 in qualified trade or business start-up expenses. The $5,000 deduction is reduced (but not below zero) by the amount of the taxpayer’s total startup costs that exceed $50,000. The new law raises the deduction limit to $10,000 and increases the phase-out threshold to $60,000 for one year, 2010.

IMPACT. Start-up expenses are costs related to creating an active trade or business, or investigating the creation or acquisition of an active trade or business. They are costs not directly related to capital or equipment and have been generally relegated to amortization above the current $5,000 deductible amount. The increase in the deduction amount is intended to allow entrepreneurs to recover more small business start-up expenses up-front, increasing cash flow and the ability to hire more workers.

Self-Employment Income

A self-employed individual can take a deduction for health insurance costs paid for the individual and his or her immediate family for income tax purposes. However, in determining the self-employment income subject to self-employment taxes, the self-employed individual cannot deduct any health insurance costs. Under the new law, the deduction for income tax purposes for the cost of health insurance is allowed in calculating net earnings from self-employment for purposes of self-employment taxes. The provision only applies to the self-employed taxpayer’s first tax year beginning after December 31, 2009.

COMMENT. The health insurance business deduction for self-employed individuals was implemented in 1987 and subsequently made permanent. This equalized the treatment of health insurance costs that an employer pays for employees and for self-employed individuals. However, health insurance costs did not reduce wages subject to self-employment taxes. Employees must take health insurance costs as an itemized deduction, but get the benefit of having pre-tax premium contributions reduce the amount of wages subject to FICA. The new law reduces the burden on self-employed individuals.

COMMENT. The Joint Committee on Taxation noted that it is intended that earned income within the meaning of Code Sec. 401(c)(2) be computed without regards to the deduction for health insurance. Thus, earned income for purposes of the limitation applicable to the health insurance deduction is computed without regard to this deduction.


The new law gives taxpayers a greater number of options for their retirement plan dollars. Two provisions facilitate contributions to designated Roth accounts. A third provision expands the options for nonqualified annuity contracts.

IMPACT. Although these are taxpayer friendly provisions, they are treated as revenue raisers because they encourage up-front distributions that are taxable.

457(b) Plan Deferrals

Beginning in 2011, the new law authorizes eligible state and local government 457(b) plans (but not plans of nonprofit organizations) to allow participants to contribute deferred amounts to designated Roth accounts. A similar provision already applies to 401(k) and 403(b) plans and will take effect in 2011 for the federal Thrift Savings Plan.

IMPACT. Contributions to Roth accounts are after-tax, but earnings accumulate tax-free and can be distributed tax-free if contributions are held for five years and certain other requirements are met.

401(k) Rollovers To Roth Accounts

The new law authorizes 401(k), 403(b) and 457(b) governmental plans to allow participants to roll over qualified distributions, including in-service distributions, into a designated Roth account within their plans. The rollover will be taxable, except for any after-tax contributions. The provision is effective for distributions after September 27, 2010. If an amount is rolled over in 2010, the amount is included ratably in income in equal amounts over 2011 and 2012, unless the taxpayer elects otherwise.

IMPACT. The ability to report income from the 2010 rollover in 2011 and 2012 echoes existing rules for converting a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA in 2010. Plans and taxpayer may need to move quickly. First, the plan must be amended to permit these rollovers. Then, participants must act before year-end on any qualifying distribution if they want to take advantage of either the two-year deferral into 2011 or 2012 or lower tax rates in 2010 if Congress does not extend the 2001 individual marginal income tax rate reductions.

IMPACT. Especially with 401(k) balances still reeling from stock market declines, distribution rollovers to Roth accounts now — while the income to be recognized on those balances upon distribution is still low — will make immediate rollovers highly popular. One drawback, for many taxpayers, however, will be finding the cash to pay the income tax. If taken from the otherwise qualifying distribution, that amount would be taxed immediately and permanently lose the benefit of deferral.

COMMENT. The JCT explained that it is intended that the IRS will provide employers with a remedial amendment period to allow employers to offer this option for distributions during 2010 and then have adequate time to amend their plans.


The bill allows an owner of a nonqualified annuity contract to split up the contract, by taking a portion of the benefits as a separate stream of annuity payments while leaving the balance of the contract untouched. The annuitization period must be for 10 years or more, or for the lives of one or more individuals. Amounts remaining with the contract will continue to accumulate earnings on a tax-deferred basis. The provision applies to amounts received in tax years beginning after December 31, 2010.

COMMENT. A nonqualified annuity contract is an annuity contract held outside of a qualified retirement plan or an individual retirement account.


In addition to the $6.6 billion raised by the retirement-friendly provisions (discussed above), the Small Business Jobs Act offsets the price tag for its $12 billion in tax relief with some not-so-friendly changes in the name of reducing the tax gap and closing unintended “loopholes.”

Information Reporting On Rental Property Expense Payments

The new law requires qualified individuals receiving rental income from real property to file information returns with the IRS and to service providers reporting payments of $600 or more during the year for rental property expenses. The new information reporting requirement applies to payments made after December 31, 2010.

IMPACT. Expanded information reporting is a popular revenue raiser in Congress and predictions are that reporting obligations, and their related compliance costs, will more than quadruple for taxpayers if Congress continues on its present course. Reliance by Congress on increased information reporting to provide “quick and easy” revenue offsets worries many tax practitioners and the National Taxpayer Advocate. However, the IRS has promised to remove duplicative reporting where possible.

Exceptions. The new law includes exceptions to the rental property expense reporting requirement, such as exceptions for individuals who can show that the reporting requirement creates a hardship and any individual who receives rental income of not more than a minimal amount (both as will be determined by the IRS). The new law also provides for an exception for members of the military or employees of the intelligence community who rent their principal residence on a temporary basis.

Higher Failure-To-File Penalties On Information Returns

The new law substantially increases the penalties for failing to timely file information returns with the IRS: First-tier penalties (filing an information return after the filing deadline but not more than 30 days after the due date) increase from $15 to $30. The calendar year maximum will increase from $75,000 to $250,000. Second-tier penalties (filing an information return more than 30 days after it is due but before August 1) will increase from $30 to $60, and the calendar year maximum will increase from $150,000 to $500,000.  Third-tier penalties (for failing to file before August 1) will increase from $50 to $100, and the calendar year maximum will increase from $250,000 to $1.5 million.



After December 31, 2010, reduced individual income tax rates are scheduled to revert to their pre-2001 levels, with the top rate rising to 39.6 percent. President Obama wants to permanently extend all of the individual rate cuts except for the top two rates. A growing number of lawmakers are calling for a temporary extension, for one or two years, of all the sunsetting tax cuts.


A package of tax extenders (H.R. 4213), which passed the House earlier this year, has languished in the Senate. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Montana, recently introduced a new tax extenders bill. Baucus’ bill would extend a host of popular but temporary tax incentives, such as the state and local sales tax deduction, the teachers’ classroom expense deduction, and the higher education tuition deduction, through the end of 2010. Baucus’ bill excludes a controversial revenue raiser: the imposition of self-employment taxes on certain shareholders in S corps. The individual tax rate reductions and tax extenders are not the only tax items on Congress’ Fall agenda. The federal estate tax; Reduced capital gains/dividends tax rates; An AMT “patch;” Worker classification reform; More international tax reforms; Energy tax incentives; and National disaster relief.


President Obama has proposed allowing qualified businesses to immediately writeoff 100 percent of new investments in equipment made through the end of 2011. Generally, current rules provide for a longer period, three to 20 years. The president has also proposed to make permanent the research tax credit, which expired at the end of 2009. Under the president’s proposal, the simplified research credit would increase to 17 percent.

IMPACT. Under the president’s proposal, qualified taxpayers would be able to immediately write-off business expenses in the first year, enabling taxpayers to lower their taxable income by the full amount of qualified investments.

COMMENT. President Obama proposed to offset the estimated $180 billion cost of his proposals by unspecified closings of tax loopholes. The $180 billion cost means the proposals are unlikely to gain much traction in Congress


The House and Senate have considered but rejected legislation to repeal expanded business information reporting under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Under the PPACA, businesses, charities and state and local governments will file an information return for all payments aggregating $600 or more in a calendar year to a single provider of goods or services (with some exceptions for tax-exempt payees), for payments made after 2011. The PPACA also repeals the long-standing reporting exception for payments to a corporation, also effective for payments made after 2011.

COMMENT. Stand-alone legislation (S. 3783) to exempt very small businesses and raise the filing threshold to $5,000 has been introduced in the Senate but is unlikely to be taken up before the November elections.

© CCH INCORPORATED, a Wolters Kluwer Business . All Rights Reserved. Reprinted with permission from CCH Tax Briefing, September 27, 2010.

This update is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. For further information please contact one of our attorneys. Information contained herein has been abridged from laws, court decisions and administrative rulings, and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on specific facts.  The enclosed material is provided for education and information purposes by MacLean Holloway Doherty Ardiff & Morse, P.C. to clients and others who may be interested in the subject matter.